Rie
Sitting For The Newtons
Posts: 1,998
|
Post by Rie on Mar 5, 2008 3:51:44 GMT -5
^Maybe...
|
|
sarish
Sitting For The Papadakis's
Posts: 1,618
|
Post by sarish on Mar 5, 2008 9:05:55 GMT -5
Jessi and Becca are NOT how I pictured them, as you all have already stated. Danielle is decent. She looks her age. Why is Jessi leaning forward? Don't serious ballerinas take pride in good posture?
|
|
|
Post by Sweet City Girl on Mar 5, 2008 11:43:11 GMT -5
I actually don't mind Jessi's and Becca's looks too much, even though I don't picture them that way in my head....Jessi looks too old for eleven, though.
I also like their earrings and I love the yard. Becca's outfit it cute.
Is that white spot by Jessi's knee a tear in her jeans, or is that something else?
|
|
Penny Lane
Sitting For The Arnolds
The Girl With Colitis Goes By
Posts: 2,888
|
Post by Penny Lane on Mar 5, 2008 12:08:07 GMT -5
Becca's hand looks really weird.
|
|
|
Post by booboobrewer on Mar 5, 2008 13:29:53 GMT -5
Man, Jessi's jeans look short...
|
|
|
Post by wenonah4th on Mar 5, 2008 14:25:36 GMT -5
Jessi's expresssion is strange. Danielle's scarf is going to fall off shortly. That's a really difficult way to keep one on.
|
|
|
Post by aln1982 on Mar 5, 2008 17:09:59 GMT -5
I just can't pay much attention to the characters in the picture and don't think they look as bad as on some. Danielle somehow looks different from how I imagine her (though I'm not sure how I do picture her ;D) I do kind of like the cover color, though. Mine is the new version and in blue but I think I like this one better because it's sort of different. ;D
|
|
msstock87
Sitting For The Braddocks
Here Comes The Bride!
Created by Rie.
Posts: 3,618
|
Post by msstock87 on Mar 5, 2008 17:39:29 GMT -5
I don't really like Jessi's face in this picture that much and Becca looks a little weird to me as well.
|
|
|
Post by sweetvalleygirl99 on Mar 5, 2008 20:38:36 GMT -5
Both Jessi and Becca look weird on this cover, not like how I pictured them to look.
|
|
Rie
Sitting For The Newtons
Posts: 1,998
|
Post by Rie on Mar 6, 2008 1:17:41 GMT -5
Thank you,guys,for sharing us your opinions about the BSC book cover yesterday,Jessi's Wish. Here's our new BSC book cover for the day(March 6,2008,Thursday): Have fun!!!
|
|
|
Post by greer on Mar 6, 2008 1:24:24 GMT -5
I like the old cover better, even though pink my favorite color.
|
|
alula
Sitter-In-Training
Posts: 406
|
Post by alula on Mar 6, 2008 2:13:59 GMT -5
Dawn on this cover looks more as I picture her, but I love the Barrett kids on the original cover. It's a nice attention to detail to include Pow. For some reason, I find it very amusing that even in the crazy!Barrett home, Suzi's socks match her shirt.
I always disliked the tagline on this cover. For such self-proclaimed experts on children, the BSC sure freaks out easily.
|
|
|
Post by booboobrewer on Mar 6, 2008 2:23:14 GMT -5
The Barretts were in no way monsters...that's quite odd.
I love the inclusion of Pow! Awesome. But I do prefer the old cover Barrett kids; Marnie looks very cute on the old cover. Also, the old picture of Dawn is much more familiar to me and seems more "Dawn" to me. Plus she's wearing a tails-out shirt, cuffed pants...how she's described as dressing, in the early books. Although I like this picture of her, and her outfit; she looks very much like she does on the cover of Dawn and Too Many Sitters.
|
|
Rie
Sitting For The Newtons
Posts: 1,998
|
Post by Rie on Mar 6, 2008 3:08:22 GMT -5
^I agree about the Barretts not being monsters. I like the old book cover better too,Marnie's cuter there,but I think Buddy's too fat there. ;D
|
|
|
Post by greer on Mar 6, 2008 3:54:12 GMT -5
nice canadian tuxedo, dawn.
i don't think buddy looks overly fat for a normal child on the old cover, but he's described as skinny so you might be right, mary anne spier.
|
|