Post by aln1982 on May 19, 2007 16:22:09 GMT -5
Like all of the Portrait books, this one gave me a lot of insight into the character’s personality. I enjoyed reading how Kristy has not changed much over time. There were lots of funny parts in this one and I liked Kristy’s first great idea of the snowpeople building business. You can see a lot of Karen in her with the big ideas.
Patrick was a real jerk! This book makes me hate him so much as a father. Elizabeth doesn’t win a parent of the year award in my book, either. First of all, it was obvious that her marriage was not going well for years. Why keep having kids? I hate it when people do this trying to “save the marriage” because it usually just ends up creating more problems for everyone involved and never seems to work. I felt so sorry for Charlie having all of the responsibilities at a young age – Sam and Kristy too. It’s a wonder they turned out as great as they did. I know some might argue the responsibilities helped, but they could have just as easily had the opposite effect. This book also made me like David Michael a bit more because I feel pretty sorry for him. The one question I have is where was Nannie and why didn’t she help out more?
I thought it was a little weird and almost creepy how Patrick wanted only to see Kristy. I felt so sorry for her with the glove and loved how Watson bought her one at the end. It almost symbolized the feeling that I get from Kristy of “Watson’s my “dad” now.” I love that as I think he’s so great to all of Elizabeth’s kids and enjoyed his relationship with Kristy in this book.
I really liked the pictures in this book, too, especially the ones with the snowpeople. The girls are so cute! For some reason, this one seemed to read easier than MA and Claudia’s Books (the only portraits I’ve recently reread). I think I liked it better, too, maybe because I like Kristy. I don’t know if this is my favorite portrait book but I thought it gave great insight into Kristy, was pretty funny and deserved higher than the B grade the teacher gave her (not sure how the grades were assigned for the portraits but I might have graded them differently – I guess I wasn’t reading for English content, though
Patrick was a real jerk! This book makes me hate him so much as a father. Elizabeth doesn’t win a parent of the year award in my book, either. First of all, it was obvious that her marriage was not going well for years. Why keep having kids? I hate it when people do this trying to “save the marriage” because it usually just ends up creating more problems for everyone involved and never seems to work. I felt so sorry for Charlie having all of the responsibilities at a young age – Sam and Kristy too. It’s a wonder they turned out as great as they did. I know some might argue the responsibilities helped, but they could have just as easily had the opposite effect. This book also made me like David Michael a bit more because I feel pretty sorry for him. The one question I have is where was Nannie and why didn’t she help out more?
I thought it was a little weird and almost creepy how Patrick wanted only to see Kristy. I felt so sorry for her with the glove and loved how Watson bought her one at the end. It almost symbolized the feeling that I get from Kristy of “Watson’s my “dad” now.” I love that as I think he’s so great to all of Elizabeth’s kids and enjoyed his relationship with Kristy in this book.
I really liked the pictures in this book, too, especially the ones with the snowpeople. The girls are so cute! For some reason, this one seemed to read easier than MA and Claudia’s Books (the only portraits I’ve recently reread). I think I liked it better, too, maybe because I like Kristy. I don’t know if this is my favorite portrait book but I thought it gave great insight into Kristy, was pretty funny and deserved higher than the B grade the teacher gave her (not sure how the grades were assigned for the portraits but I might have graded them differently – I guess I wasn’t reading for English content, though
